Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pine, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Beller, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pine, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Beller, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Potential Effectiueness of Quality Assurance Screening Using Large but Imperfect Databases

Michael B. Pine, MD, MBA

David F. Rogers, PHD

David Morgan, PHD

Robert H. Beller, MPA

To examine the effect of imprecise classification of patient risk (severity of illness) on an otherwise highly accurate quality assurance screening technique, data on clinical outcomes were generated for a simulated hospital system consisting of 108 facilities treating approx imately 565,000 patients a year. In these simulations, marked differences in facility size, casemix distribution, and quality of care were combined with random variations in outcome. Pooled data for all 108 facilities were used to create algorithms that combined 468 discrete patient risk classifications into either ten or three groups with broad, overlapping ranges of patient-specific risks of unfavorable clinical results. When derived algorithms were applied to independently generated facility-specific data, the ability to identify hospital systems with and without quality of care problems was maintained with ten, but not with three, risk groups. However, even three moderately heterogeneous risk groups were sufficient to preserve a high degree of sensitivity and specificity in screening for potential quality of care problems within individual facilities. Thus, outcome-based quality assurance screening can be highly accurate in actual health care situations in which only imprecise estimations of patient-specific risk can be achieved. Key words: quality assurance; simulation; health care outcomes; casemix correction; risk adjustment; indirect standardization; clinical indicators; provider comparisons; database development; healthcare monitoring. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:126- 134)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 2, 126-134 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. D. Horbar
Birthweight-adjusted Mortality Rates for Assessing the Effectiueness of Neonatal Intensive Care
Med Decis Making, December 1, 1992; 12(4): 259 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]