This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Matchar, D. B. Articles by Feussner, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Matchar, D. B. Articles by Feussner, J. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Bayesian Method for Evaluating Medical Test operating Characteristics When Some Patients' Conditions Fail to Be Diagnosed by the Reference Standard

David L. Simel, MD

John F. Geweke, PhD

John R. Feussner, MD

The evaluation of a diagnostic test when the reference standard fails to establish a diagnosis in some patients is a common and difficult analytical problem. Conventional operating char acteristics, derived from a 2 x 2 matrix, require that tests have only positive or negative results, and that disease status be designated definitively as present or absent. Results can be displayed in a 2 x 3 matrix, with an additional column for undiagnosed patients, when it is not possible always to ascertain the disease status definitively. The authors approach this problem using a Bayesian method for evaluating the 2 x 3 matrix in which test operating characteristics are described by a joint probability density function. They show that one can derive this joint probability density function of sensitivity and specificity empirically by applying a sampling algorithm. The three-dimensional histogram resulting from this sampling pro cedure approximates the true joint probability density function for sensitivity and specificity. Using a clinical example, the authors illustrate the method and demonstrate that the joint probability density function for sensitivity and specificity can be influenced by assumptions used to interpret test results in undiagnosed patients. This Bayesian method represents a flexible and practical solution to the problem of evaluating test sensitivity and specificity when the study group includes patients whose disease could not be diagnosed by the reference standard. Key words: Bayesian analysis; test operating characteristics; probability density functions. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:102-111)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 2, 102-111 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000203


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. A. Diamond Off Bayes: Effect of Verification Bias on Posterior Probabilities Calculated Using Bayes' Theorem Med Decis Making, February 1, 1992; 12(1): 22 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. B. Lusted The Clearing "Haze": A View from My Window Med Decis Making, June 1, 1991; 11(2): 76 - 87. [PDF]

				R. F. Nease JR and D. K. Owens Assessment and Representation of Prior Beliefs: Unexpected Implications of the Uniform Distribution Med Decis Making, June 1, 1990; 10(2): 112 - 114. [PDF]

				D. B. Matchar, J. F. Geweke, D. L. Simel, and J. R. Feussner Uniform Priors Aren't a Thing of the Past Med Decis Making, June 1, 1990; 10(2): 114 - 115. [PDF]