This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Poses, R. M. Articles by Scott, W. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Poses, R. M. Articles by Scott, W. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What Difference Do Two Days Make? The Inertia of Physicians' Sequential Prognostic Judgments for Critically III Patients

Carolyn Bekes, MD

Fiore J. Copare, MD

William E. Scott, MD

Medical authorities have asserted the importance of observing a patient's clinical course over time. Distinguished committees have suggested that changes over time in physicians' prognostic estimates should influence decisions to transfer patients out of intensive care units (ICUs). This study evaluated how the opportunity to observe patients over time affected physicians' prognostic estimates for a cohort of 269 critically ill patients sequentially admitted to a medical-surgical ICU in a teaching hospital. As soon as possible after admission and again 48 hours later, the authors obtained a quantitative estimate of the probability of survival through hospital discharge from each patient's house officer and primary attending physician, and the critical care attending physician on duty. They independently determined each patient's survival. From this population they analyzed 181 pairs of judgments made by the same house officers, 211 pairs by the same primary attendings, and 172 pairs by the same critical care attendings. The physicians' 48-hour estimates were little changed from their previous estimates for the same patients. The correlation coefficient for the house officers' paired estimates was 0.84 (p <0.0001 ); for the critical care attendings' estimates 0.84 (p <0.0001), and for the primary attendings' estimates, 0.90 (p <0.0001). Forty-eight hours did not substantially reduce the disagreements present between estimates made by different physicians for the same patient. No group of physicians substantially improved the reliability or the discriminating power of its later estimates. The physicians in the study could not take advantage of sequential clinical information over time. These results point out the need to teach physicians how to better integrate and process sequential clinical data. Key words: sequential data; prediction; survival rate; prognosis; intensive care unit. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:6-14)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 1, 6-14 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Hamm Theory about Heuristic Strategies Based on Verbal Protocol Analysis: The Emperor Needs a Shave Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 681 - 686. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. S. Drought and B. A. Koenig "Choice" in End-of-Life Decision Making: Researching Fact or Fiction? Gerontologist, October 1, 2002; 42(90003): 114 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. R. Arkes The Covariance Decomposition of the Probability Score and Its Use in Evaluating Prognostic Estimates: Hal R. Arkes, PhD, Neal V. Dawson, Md, Theodore Speroff, PhD, Frank E. Harrell, Jr., PhD, Carlos Alzola, Ms, Russell Phillips, Md, Norman Desbiens, Md, Robert K. Oye, Md, William Knaus, Md, Alfred F. Connors, Jr., Md, and the Support Investigators Med Decis Making, June 1, 1995; 15(2): 120 - 131. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Knaus, D. Wagner, and J Lynn Short-term mortality predictions for critically ill hospitalized adults: science and ethics Science, October 18, 1991; 254(5030): 389 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF]