Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, B. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Whose Utilities for Decision Analysis?

Norman F. Boyd, MD

Heather J. Sutherland, RN

Karen Z. Heasman, MD

David L. Tritchler, ScD

Bernard J. Cummings, MB

The goal of this study was to examine sources of variation in the utilities assigned to health states. The authors selected a common clinical problem, carcinoma of the rectum, and examined the utilities assigned to colostomy, a common outcome of treatment for that disease. After preparing and validating a description of colostomy and its effects on patients' lives, utilities for the state were obtained from five groups of individuals. These comprised two groups of patients who received treatment for rectal cancer, a group of physicians and surgeons specializing in the treatment of this disease, and two groups of healthy subjects, none of whom were health professionals. Of the patients who had been treated for rectal cancer, one group had been treated surgically with the formation of colostomies and the other had been treated with radiotherapy and none had a colostomy. Utilities for colostomy were elicited using the standard gamble, category rating, and a treatment choice question naire. The groups differed substantially in the utilities assigned to colostomy. In general, patients with colostomies and physicians assigned significantly higher utilities than did pa tients who did not themselves have a colostomy. The clinical significance of these differences was examined in a simplified clinical decision problem that compared surgery (with colostomy) and radiotherapy (without colostomy) as primary treatment. The expected clinical value of these treatment alternatives was substantially influenced by the differences observed in utilities for colostomy. These results emphasize the importance of patient utilities in clinical decision making and the need to gain greater understanding of the factors that influence the utilities that patients assign to health states. Key words: utilities; decision analysis; oncology. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:58-67)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 1, 58-67 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000109


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
N. Mittmann, H.-J. Au, D. Tu, C. J. O'Callaghan, P. K. Isogai, C. S. Karapetis, J. R. Zalcberg, W. K. Evans, M. J. Moore, J. Siddiqui, et al.
Prospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 2, 2009; 101(17): 1182 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
L. Winter, M. S. Moss, and C. Hoffman
Affective Forecasting and Advance Care Planning: Anticipating Quality of Life in Future Health Statuses
J Health Psychol, April 1, 2009; 14(3): 447 - 456.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. T. Gilbert, M. A. Killingsworth, R. N. Eyre, and T. D. Wilson
The Surprising Power of Neighborly Advice
Science, March 20, 2009; 323(5921): 1617 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
E. Walsh and P. Ayton
What Would It Be Like for Me and for You? Judged Impact of Chronic Health Conditions on Happiness
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 15 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
M Schlander
The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process
J. Med. Ethics, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 534 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
B. R. Schackman, P. A. Teixeira, G. Weitzman, A. I. Mushlin, and I. M. Jacobson
Quality-of-Life Tradeoffs for Hepatitis C Treatment: Do Patients and Providers Agree?
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 233 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
W. L. Nelson, P. K. J. Han, A. Fagerlin, M. Stefanek, and P. A. Ubel
Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 609 - 618.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
K. E. Bremner, C. A. K. Y. Chong, G. Tomlinson, S. M. H. Alibhai, and M. D. Krahn
A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utilities
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 288 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. P. Weinfurt
Value of High-Cost Cancer Care: A Behavioral Science Perspective
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2007; 25(2): 223 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
O. Kostopoulou
The Transient Nature of Utilities and Health Preferences
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 304 - 306.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. H. Ditto, J. A. Jacobson, W. D. Smucker, J. H. Danks, and A. Fagerlin
Context Changes Choices: A Prospective Study of the Effects of Hospitalization on Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 313 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. H. Goldberg
Being There Is Important, but Getting There Matters Too: The Role of Path in the Valuation Process
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 323 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
T. R. Fried, A. L. Byers, W. T. Gallo, P. H. Van Ness, V. R. Towle, J. R. O'Leary, and J. A. Dubin
Prospective Study of Health Status Preferences and Changes in Preferences Over Time in Older Adults.
Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2006; 166(8): 890 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. M. Epstein, B. S. Alper, and T. E. Quill
Communicating Evidence for Participatory Decision Making
JAMA, May 19, 2004; 291(19): 2359 - 2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. J. Telford, J. R. Saltzman, K. M. Kuntz, and S. Syngal
Impact of Preoperative Staging and Chemoradiation Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 191 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. Baron, D. A. Asch, A. Fagerlin, C. Jepson, G. Loewenstein, J. Riis, M. G. Stineman, and P. A. Ubel
Effect of Assessment Method on the Discrepancy between Judgments of Health Disorders People have and do not have: A Web Study
Med Decis Making, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 422 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
T. O. Tengs and T. H. Lin
A Meta-Analysis of Utility Estimates for HIV/AIDS
Med Decis Making, December 1, 2002; 22(6): 475 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
A. FAGERLIN, P. H. DITTO, N. A. HAWKINS, C. E. SCHNEIDER, and W. D. SMUCKER
The Use of Advance Directives in End-of-life Decision Making: Problems and Possibilities
American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2002; 46(2): 268 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
B. R. Schackman, S. J. Goldie, K. A. Freedberg, E. Losina, J. Brazier, and M. C. Weinstein
Comparison of Health State Utilities Using Community and Patient Preference Weights Derived from a Survey of Patients with HIV/AIDS
Med Decis Making, February 1, 2002; 22(1): 27 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
R. M. Houts, W. D. Smucker, J. A. Jacobson, P. H. Ditto, and J. H. Danks
Predicting Elderly Outpatients' Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Time: The Majority Rules
Med Decis Making, February 1, 2002; 22(1): 39 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
S. J. T. Jansen, J. Kievit, M. A. Nooij, and A. M. Stiggelbout
Stability of Patients' Preferences for Chemotherapy: The Impact of Experience
Med Decis Making, August 1, 2001; 21(4): 295 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. W. Torrance, D. Feeny, and W. Furlong
Visual Analog Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States?
Med Decis Making, August 1, 2001; 21(4): 329 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. A. Ubel, G. Loewenstein, J. Hershey, J. Baron, T. Mohr, D. A. Asch, and C. Jepson
Do Nonpatients Underestimate the Quality of Life Associated with Chronic Health Conditions because of a Focusing Illusion?
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2001; 21(3): 190 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. F. M. Stalmeier, M. K. Goldstein, A. M. Holmes, L. Lenert, J. Miyamoto, A. M. Stiggelbout, G. W. Torrance, and J. Tsevat
What Should Be Reported in a Methods Section on Utility Assessment?
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2001; 21(3): 200 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. R. Beck
Medical Decision Making: 20 Years of Advancing the Field
Med Decis Making, February 1, 2001; 21(1): 73 - 75.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
I. Unic, L. C.G. Verhoef, P. F.M. Stalmeier, and W. A.J. Van Daal
Prophylactic Mastectomy or Screening in Women Suspected to Have the BRCA1/2 Mutation: A Prospective Pilot Study of Women's Treatment Choices and Medical and Decision-analytic Recommendations
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 251 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
S. J.T. Jansen, A. M. Stiggelbout, P. P. Wakker, M. A. Nooij, E. M. Noordijk, and J. Kievit
Unstable Preferences:: A Shift in Valuation or an Effect of the Elicitation Procedure?
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 62 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. Dolan
Whose Preferences Count?
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1999; 19(4): 482 - 486.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. R. Treadwell and L. A. Lenert
Health Values and Prospect Theory
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 344 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
C. M. Ruland
Decision Support for Patient Preference-based Care Planning: Effects on Nursing Care and Patient Outcomes
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 1999; 6(4): 304 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. S. Heckerling, M. S. Verp, and N. Albert
Patient or Physician Preferences for Decision Analysis: The Prenatal Genetic Testing Decision
Med Decis Making, January 1, 1999; 19(1): 66 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. L. Bosch, J. K. Hammitt, M. C. Weinstein, and M. G.M. Hunink
Estimating General-population Utilities Using One Binary-gamble Question per Respondent
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1998; 18(4): 381 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. B. Chapman, A. S. Elstein, T. M. Kuzel, R. Sharifi, R. B. Nadler, A. Andrews, and C. L. Bennett
Prostate Cancer Patients' Utilities for Health States: How It Looks Depends on Where You Stand
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1998; 18(3): 278 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
E. J. Stanek, J. W.M. Cheng, P. J. Peeples, R. J. Simko, and S. A. Spinler
Patient Preferences for Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1997; 17(4): 464 - 471.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
F. H.J. Roest, M. J.C. Eijkemans, J. Van Der Donk, P. C. Levendag, C. A. Meeuwis, P. I.M. Schmitz, and J. D. F. Habbema
The Use of Confidence Intervals for Individual Utilities:: Limits to Formal Decision Analysis for Treatment Choice
Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 285 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
E. B. Bass, S. Wills, I. U. Scott, J. C. Javitt, J. M. Tielsch, O. D. Schein, and E. P. Steinberg
Preference Values for Visual States in Patients Planning to Undergo Cataract Surgery
Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 324 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
R. J. Volk, S. B. Cantor, S. J. Spann, A. R. Cass, M. P. Cardenas, and M. M. Warren
Preferences of Husbands and Wives for Prostate Cancer Screening
Arch Fam Med, January 1, 1997; 6(1): 72 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. L. Bosch and M. G.M. Hunink
The Relationship between Descriptive and Valuational Quality-of-life Measures in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1996; 16(3): 217 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. Y. Chen, J. Daley, and G. E. Thibault
Angina Patients' Ratings of Current Health and Health without Angina: Associations with Severity of Angina and Comorbidity
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1996; 16(2): 169 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. M. Stiggelbout, J.C.J.M. De Haes, G. M. Kiebert, J. Kievit, and J.-W. H. Leer
Tradeoffs between Quality and Quantity of Life: Development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient Attitudes
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1996; 16(2): 184 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. B. Chapman, A. S. Elstein, and K. K. Hughes
Effects of Patient Education on Decisions about Breast Cancer Treatments: A Preliminary Report
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1995; 15(3): 231 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. C. Sorum
Deciding About Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Contributions of Decision Analysis
Arch Intern Med, March 13, 1995; 155(5): 513 - 521.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A.M. Stiggelbout, G.M. Kiebert, J. Kievit, J.W.H. Leer, G. Stoter, and J.C.J.M. De Haes
Utility Assessment in Cancer Patients: Adjustment of Time Tradeoff Scores for the Utility of Life Years and Comparison with Standard Gamble Scores
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1994; 14(1): 82 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
P. A. Groome, T. A. Hutchinson, and P. Tousignant
Content of a Decision Analysis for Treatment Choice in End-stage Renal Disease: Who Should Be consulted?
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1994; 14(1): 91 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. M. Kiebert, A. M. Stiggelbout, J.-W. H. Leer, J. Kievit, and H. J.C.J.M. De Haes
Test-Retest Reliabilities of Two Treatment-preference Instruments in Measuring Utilities
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1993; 13(2): 133 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]