This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Boyd, N. F. Articles by Cummings, B. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boyd, N. F. Articles by Cummings, B. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Whose Utilities for Decision Analysis?

Heather J. Sutherland, RN

Karen Z. Heasman, MD

David L. Tritchler, ScD

Bernard J. Cummings, MB

The goal of this study was to examine sources of variation in the utilities assigned to health states. The authors selected a common clinical problem, carcinoma of the rectum, and examined the utilities assigned to colostomy, a common outcome of treatment for that disease. After preparing and validating a description of colostomy and its effects on patients' lives, utilities for the state were obtained from five groups of individuals. These comprised two groups of patients who received treatment for rectal cancer, a group of physicians and surgeons specializing in the treatment of this disease, and two groups of healthy subjects, none of whom were health professionals. Of the patients who had been treated for rectal cancer, one group had been treated surgically with the formation of colostomies and the other had been treated with radiotherapy and none had a colostomy. Utilities for colostomy were elicited using the standard gamble, category rating, and a treatment choice question naire. The groups differed substantially in the utilities assigned to colostomy. In general, patients with colostomies and physicians assigned significantly higher utilities than did pa tients who did not themselves have a colostomy. The clinical significance of these differences was examined in a simplified clinical decision problem that compared surgery (with colostomy) and radiotherapy (without colostomy) as primary treatment. The expected clinical value of these treatment alternatives was substantially influenced by the differences observed in utilities for colostomy. These results emphasize the importance of patient utilities in clinical decision making and the need to gain greater understanding of the factors that influence the utilities that patients assign to health states. Key words: utilities; decision analysis; oncology. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:58-67)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 1, 58-67 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000109


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Mittmann, H.-J. Au, D. Tu, C. J. O'Callaghan, P. K. Isogai, C. S. Karapetis, J. R. Zalcberg, W. K. Evans, M. J. Moore, J. Siddiqui, et al. Prospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, September 2, 2009; 101(17): 1182 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Winter, M. S. Moss, and C. Hoffman Affective Forecasting and Advance Care Planning: Anticipating Quality of Life in Future Health Statuses J Health Psychol, April 1, 2009; 14(3): 447 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. T. Gilbert, M. A. Killingsworth, R. N. Eyre, and T. D. Wilson The Surprising Power of Neighborly Advice Science, March 20, 2009; 323(5921): 1617 - 1619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Walsh and P. Ayton What Would It Be Like for Me and for You? Judged Impact of Chronic Health Conditions on Happiness Med Decis Making, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 15 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M Schlander The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process J. Med. Ethics, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 534 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Schackman, P. A. Teixeira, G. Weitzman, A. I. Mushlin, and I. M. Jacobson Quality-of-Life Tradeoffs for Hepatitis C Treatment: Do Patients and Providers Agree? Med Decis Making, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 233 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. L. Nelson, P. K. J. Han, A. Fagerlin, M. Stefanek, and P. A. Ubel Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 609 - 618. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. E. Bremner, C. A. K. Y. Chong, G. Tomlinson, S. M. H. Alibhai, and M. D. Krahn A Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utilities Med Decis Making, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 288 - 298. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. P. Weinfurt Value of High-Cost Cancer Care: A Behavioral Science Perspective J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2007; 25(2): 223 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Kostopoulou The Transient Nature of Utilities and Health Preferences Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 304 - 306. [PDF]

				P. H. Ditto, J. A. Jacobson, W. D. Smucker, J. H. Danks, and A. Fagerlin Context Changes Choices: A Prospective Study of the Effects of Hospitalization on Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 313 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Goldberg Being There Is Important, but Getting There Matters Too: The Role of Path in the Valuation Process Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 323 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. R. Fried, A. L. Byers, W. T. Gallo, P. H. Van Ness, V. R. Towle, J. R. O'Leary, and J. A. Dubin Prospective Study of Health Status Preferences and Changes in Preferences Over Time in Older Adults. Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2006; 166(8): 890 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Epstein, B. S. Alper, and T. E. Quill Communicating Evidence for Participatory Decision Making JAMA, May 19, 2004; 291(19): 2359 - 2366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Telford, J. R. Saltzman, K. M. Kuntz, and S. Syngal Impact of Preoperative Staging and Chemoradiation Versus Postoperative Chemoradiation on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Decision Analysis J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 191 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Baron, D. A. Asch, A. Fagerlin, C. Jepson, G. Loewenstein, J. Riis, M. G. Stineman, and P. A. Ubel Effect of Assessment Method on the Discrepancy between Judgments of Health Disorders People have and do not have: A Web Study Med Decis Making, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 422 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. O. Tengs and T. H. Lin A Meta-Analysis of Utility Estimates for HIV/AIDS Med Decis Making, December 1, 2002; 22(6): 475 - 481. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. FAGERLIN, P. H. DITTO, N. A. HAWKINS, C. E. SCHNEIDER, and W. D. SMUCKER The Use of Advance Directives in End-of-life Decision Making: Problems and Possibilities American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2002; 46(2): 268 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Schackman, S. J. Goldie, K. A. Freedberg, E. Losina, J. Brazier, and M. C. Weinstein Comparison of Health State Utilities Using Community and Patient Preference Weights Derived from a Survey of Patients with HIV/AIDS Med Decis Making, February 1, 2002; 22(1): 27 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. M. Houts, W. D. Smucker, J. A. Jacobson, P. H. Ditto, and J. H. Danks Predicting Elderly Outpatients' Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Time: The Majority Rules Med Decis Making, February 1, 2002; 22(1): 39 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. T. Jansen, J. Kievit, M. A. Nooij, and A. M. Stiggelbout Stability of Patients' Preferences for Chemotherapy: The Impact of Experience Med Decis Making, August 1, 2001; 21(4): 295 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. W. Torrance, D. Feeny, and W. Furlong Visual Analog Scales: Do They Have a Role in the Measurement of Preferences for Health States? Med Decis Making, August 1, 2001; 21(4): 329 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Ubel, G. Loewenstein, J. Hershey, J. Baron, T. Mohr, D. A. Asch, and C. Jepson Do Nonpatients Underestimate the Quality of Life Associated with Chronic Health Conditions because of a Focusing Illusion? Med Decis Making, May 1, 2001; 21(3): 190 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. F. M. Stalmeier, M. K. Goldstein, A. M. Holmes, L. Lenert, J. Miyamoto, A. M. Stiggelbout, G. W. Torrance, and J. Tsevat What Should Be Reported in a Methods Section on Utility Assessment? Med Decis Making, May 1, 2001; 21(3): 200 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Beck Medical Decision Making: 20 Years of Advancing the Field Med Decis Making, February 1, 2001; 21(1): 73 - 75. [PDF]

				I. Unic, L. C.G. Verhoef, P. F.M. Stalmeier, and W. A.J. Van Daal Prophylactic Mastectomy or Screening in Women Suspected to Have the BRCA1/2 Mutation: A Prospective Pilot Study of Women's Treatment Choices and Medical and Decision-analytic Recommendations Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 251 - 262. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J.T. Jansen, A. M. Stiggelbout, P. P. Wakker, M. A. Nooij, E. M. Noordijk, and J. Kievit Unstable Preferences:: A Shift in Valuation or an Effect of the Elicitation Procedure? Med Decis Making, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 62 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Dolan Whose Preferences Count? Med Decis Making, October 1, 1999; 19(4): 482 - 486. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Treadwell and L. A. Lenert Health Values and Prospect Theory Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 344 - 352. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Ruland Decision Support for Patient Preference-based Care Planning: Effects on Nursing Care and Patient Outcomes J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 1999; 6(4): 304 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. S. Heckerling, M. S. Verp, and N. Albert Patient or Physician Preferences for Decision Analysis: The Prenatal Genetic Testing Decision Med Decis Making, January 1, 1999; 19(1): 66 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Bosch, J. K. Hammitt, M. C. Weinstein, and M. G.M. Hunink Estimating General-population Utilities Using One Binary-gamble Question per Respondent Med Decis Making, October 1, 1998; 18(4): 381 - 390. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. B. Chapman, A. S. Elstein, T. M. Kuzel, R. Sharifi, R. B. Nadler, A. Andrews, and C. L. Bennett Prostate Cancer Patients' Utilities for Health States: How It Looks Depends on Where You Stand Med Decis Making, August 1, 1998; 18(3): 278 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. J. Stanek, J. W.M. Cheng, P. J. Peeples, R. J. Simko, and S. A. Spinler Patient Preferences for Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Med Decis Making, October 1, 1997; 17(4): 464 - 471. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. H.J. Roest, M. J.C. Eijkemans, J. Van Der Donk, P. C. Levendag, C. A. Meeuwis, P. I.M. Schmitz, and J. D. F. Habbema The Use of Confidence Intervals for Individual Utilities:: Limits to Formal Decision Analysis for Treatment Choice Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 285 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. B. Bass, S. Wills, I. U. Scott, J. C. Javitt, J. M. Tielsch, O. D. Schein, and E. P. Steinberg Preference Values for Visual States in Patients Planning to Undergo Cataract Surgery Med Decis Making, July 1, 1997; 17(3): 324 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Volk, S. B. Cantor, S. J. Spann, A. R. Cass, M. P. Cardenas, and M. M. Warren Preferences of Husbands and Wives for Prostate Cancer Screening Arch Fam Med, January 1, 1997; 6(1): 72 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Bosch and M. G.M. Hunink The Relationship between Descriptive and Valuational Quality-of-life Measures in Patients with Intermittent Claudication Med Decis Making, August 1, 1996; 16(3): 217 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Y. Chen, J. Daley, and G. E. Thibault Angina Patients' Ratings of Current Health and Health without Angina: Associations with Severity of Angina and Comorbidity Med Decis Making, June 1, 1996; 16(2): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Stiggelbout, J.C.J.M. De Haes, G. M. Kiebert, J. Kievit, and J.-W. H. Leer Tradeoffs between Quality and Quantity of Life: Development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient Attitudes Med Decis Making, June 1, 1996; 16(2): 184 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. B. Chapman, A. S. Elstein, and K. K. Hughes Effects of Patient Education on Decisions about Breast Cancer Treatments: A Preliminary Report Med Decis Making, August 1, 1995; 15(3): 231 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. C. Sorum Deciding About Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Contributions of Decision Analysis Arch Intern Med, March 13, 1995; 155(5): 513 - 521. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A.M. Stiggelbout, G.M. Kiebert, J. Kievit, J.W.H. Leer, G. Stoter, and J.C.J.M. De Haes Utility Assessment in Cancer Patients: Adjustment of Time Tradeoff Scores for the Utility of Life Years and Comparison with Standard Gamble Scores Med Decis Making, February 1, 1994; 14(1): 82 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Groome, T. A. Hutchinson, and P. Tousignant Content of a Decision Analysis for Treatment Choice in End-stage Renal Disease: Who Should Be consulted? Med Decis Making, February 1, 1994; 14(1): 91 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. M. Kiebert, A. M. Stiggelbout, J.-W. H. Leer, J. Kievit, and H. J.C.J.M. De Haes Test-Retest Reliabilities of Two Treatment-preference Instruments in Measuring Utilities Med Decis Making, June 1, 1993; 13(2): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]