|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
An Introduction to a Bayesian Method for Meta-analysis
The Confidence Profile Method
David M. Eddy, MD, PhD
Vic Hasselblad, PhD
Ross Shachter, PhD
The Confidence Profile Method is a new Bayesian method that can be used to assess technologies where the available evidence involves a variety of experimental designs, types of outcomes, and effect measures; a variety of biases; combinations of biases and nested biases; uncertainty about biases; an underlying variability in the parameter of interest; indirect evidence; and technology families. The result of an analysis with the Confidence Profile Method is a posterior distribution for the parameter of interest, posterior distributions for other parameters, and a covariance matrix for all the parameters in the model. The posterior distributions incorporate all the uncertainty the assessor chooses to describe about any of the parameters used in the analysis. Key words: Confidence Profile Method; bias; Bayesian analysis; meta-analysis. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:15-23)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 10, No. 1,
15-23 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000104

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Sweeting, D. De Angelis, M. Hickman, and A. E. Ades
Estimating hepatitis C prevalence in England and Wales by synthesizing evidence from multiple data sources. Assessing data conflict and model fit
Biostat.,
October 1, 2008;
9(4):
715 - 734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Braithwaite, M. S. Roberts, and A. C. Justice
Incorporating Quality of Evidence into Decision Analytic Modeling
Ann Intern Med,
January 16, 2007;
146(2):
133 - 141.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. McMahon, A. M. Zaslavsky, M. C. Weinstein, K. M. Kuntz, J. C. Weeks, and G. S. Gazelle
Estimation of Mortality Rates for Disease Simulation Models Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis
Med Decis Making,
September 1, 2006;
26(5):
497 - 511.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Santaguida, M. Helfand, and P. Raina
Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Evaluate Drug Efficacy or Effectiveness
Ann Intern Med,
June 21, 2005;
142(12_Part_2):
1066 - 1072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Briggs, R. Goeree, G. Blackhouse, and B. J. O'Brien
Probabilistic Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Models: Choosing between Treatment Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 2002;
22(4):
290 - 308.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Ades and S. Cliffe
Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of a Multiparameter Decision Model: Consistency of Evidence and the Accurate Assessment of Uncertainty
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 2002;
22(4):
359 - 371.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J Spiegelhalter, J. P Myles, D. R Jones, and K. R Abrams
Methods in health service research: An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment
BMJ,
August 21, 1999;
319(7208):
508 - 512.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hellmich, K. R. Abrams, and A. J. Sutton
Bayesian Approaches to Meta-analysi of ROC Curves
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1999;
19(3):
252 - 264.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. C. Block, E. C. Peterson, R. Krone, K. Kesler, E. Hannan, G. T. O'Connor, and K. Detre
Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,
July 1, 1998;
32(1):
275 - 282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Hasselblad and D. C. McCrory
Meta-analytic Tools for Medical Decision Making: A Practical Guide
Med Decis Making,
February 1, 1995;
15(1):
81 - 96.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Shekelle, A. H. Adams, M. R. Chassin, E. L. Hurwitz, and R. H. Brook
Spinal Manipulation for Low-Back Pain
Ann Intern Med,
October 1, 1992;
117(7):
590 - 598.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Lusted
The Clearing "Haze": A View from My Window
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1991;
11(2):
76 - 87.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|