This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0272989X08323300v1 29/2/175    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Arndt, J. Articles by Lagle, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Arndt, J. Articles by Lagle, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Psychosocial Effect of Thoughts of Personal Mortality on Cardiac Risk Assessment

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arndtj{at}missouri.edu.

	Abstract

Background. Prejudice by medical providers has been found to contribute to differential cardiac risk estimates. As such, empirical examinations of psychological factors associated with such biases are warranted. Considerable psychological research implicates concerns with personal mortality in motivating prejudicial biases. The authors sought to examine whether provoking thoughts of mortality among medical students would engender more cautious cardiac risk assessments for a hypothetical Christian than for a Muslim patient. Methods. During the spring of 2007, university medical students (N = 47) were randomly assigned to conditions in a 2 (mortality salience) x 2 (patient religion) full factorial experimental design. In an online survey, participants answered questions about their mortality or about future uncertainty, inspected emergency room admittance forms for a Muslim or Christian patient complaining of chest pain, and subsequently estimated risk for coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and the combined risk of either of the two. A composite risk index was formed based on the responses (on a scale of 0–100) to each of the 3 cardiac risk questions. Results. Reminders of mortality interacted with patient religion to influence risk assessments, F_1,41 = 11:57, P = 0:002, ² = :22. After being reminded of mortality, participants rendered more serious cardiac risk estimates for a Christian patient (F_1,41 = 8:66, P = 0:01)and less serious estimates for a Muslim patient (F_1,41 = 4:08, P = 0:05). Conclusion. Reminders of personal mortality can lead to biased patient risk assessment as medical providers use their cultural identification to psychologically manage their awareness of death. Key words: terror management; mortality salience; medical bias; triage decisions; cardiac risk assessments. (Med Decis Making XXXX;XX:xx–xx)

First published on September 9, 2008, doi:10.1177/0272989X08323300

Medical Decision Making 2009;29:175.

A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?